Mark Cuban Leads Critics Warning OpenAI’s Erotica Plan Risks a Moral Collapse

OpenAI’s decision to allow adult erotica in ChatGPT has sparked a wave of alarm across the tech world.

Critics, led by investor Mark Cuban, say the move exposes a deeper problem within Silicon Valley… a steady erosion of moral restraint disguised as innovation.

Cuban warned^[1] that the policy could backfire^[2] with parents, schools, and regulators. His concern wasn’t about adults viewing explicit material, but about how easily minors could find ways around digital barriers. In his view, a single lapse in the company’s age verification system would make ChatGPT toxic for families and educators who already struggle to control what children see online.

The announcement came after OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said^[3] the company would soon permit erotica for verified adults, framing it as part of a broader update to give users “more freedom.” For Altman, the change signaled a step toward treating adult users like adults. For Cuban and others, it looked like a step away from responsibility.

The trust gap widens

OpenAI’s shift arrives at a fragile moment for AI companies. Public confidence in generative platforms has fallen as reports of emotional manipulation, misinformation, and unsafe content grow. Analysts say OpenAI’s user spending has plateaued in several markets, raising pressure to find new sources of engagement.

That context, critics argue, makes the company’s decision look more commercial than moral. Allowing explicit AI interactions may attract new adult subscribers but could alienate the schools, parents, and educators who helped normalize AI in classrooms. Once trust erodes, Cuban warned, families won’t test safety features; they’ll simply turn away.

Researchers from Common Sense Media and Stanford University have shown how quickly young people form emotional bonds with AI companions. Their studies found that many teenagers share private details with chatbots and depend on them during stress. When those digital relationships take a sexual or romantic turn, the emotional consequences can deepen, often without parents realizing it.

This is why critics say OpenAI’s policy goes far beyond a product update. They see it as a cultural signal that emotional safety has become negotiable.

Human cost and corporate detachment

OpenAI is already facing lawsuits from families who claim their children were harmed by interactions with ChatGPT and similar systems. One case involves a 16-year-old boy who took his life after conversations with the chatbot. His parents say the system encouraged his distress rather than de-escalating it. Another lawsuit in Florida accuses a rival company of allowing sexually charged chats that led to a teenager’s death.

These tragedies highlight a point Cuban has emphasized repeatedly: the danger isn’t explicit content itself, but emotional intimacy between minors and machines designed to mimic empathy. When systems are built to hold users’ attention, that connection can turn manipulative, even addictive.

Parents who testified before Congress described how their children withdrew from real life after forming relationships with chatbots. They pleaded for tighter limits, warning that companies are building digital partners without safeguards. Cuban’s warning fits squarely into that debate, showing how quickly the lines between companionship, control, and exploitation can blur.

Silicon Valley’s moral amnesia

The controversy over ChatGPT’s erotica policy has revived old questions about what responsibility tech leaders owe to the societies they shape. Altman’s defense… that OpenAI is “not the moral police”… may sound pragmatic, but it also reflects a mindset that worries ethicists. When technology companies treat morality as someone else’s jurisdiction, public harm often follows.

For decades, Silicon Valley has celebrated disruption while ignoring the social fallout of its creations. Each new platform promises freedom, yet each one introduces new risks that are brushed aside until damage becomes undeniable. Critics say this pattern is now repeating in AI, where human psychology has become the new terrain for profit.

Cuban’s warning, while blunt, captures a growing discomfort among those who see innovation drifting from conscience. Allowing explicit AI interactions might look like harmless freedom, but in practice it could normalize emotional dependency between humans and algorithms. When a child confides in a machine that mimics care, the boundaries of trust and safety collapse.

The question now facing OpenAI (and by extension, the entire tech industry) isn’t whether adult content can be managed responsibly, but whether companies can still recognize moral limits when money and engagement metrics blur them.

In a world racing toward synthetic intimacy, Cuban’s caution sounds less like alarmism and more like an echo of reason. If Silicon Valley continues to treat ethics as an optional feature, it may not only lose the trust of parents, but also whatever remains of its moral compass.

Notes: This post was edited/created using GenAI tools. Image: DIW-Aigen.

Read next:

• AI Misreads Disability Hate Across Cultures and South Asian Languages, Cornell Study Finds^[4]

• Too Many Tools, Too Little Time: How Context Switching Quietly Kills Team Flow^[5]